Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Droptek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:17, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Droptek

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking ghits and Gnews of substance. References fail to support notability. reddogsix (talk) 05:14, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Droptek should not be deleted, as Droptek is a notable dubstep producer. The article was not finished. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheRealBeelzebeard (talk • contribs) 05:43, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 12:29, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 12:29, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:TOOSOON, the only reliable source with more than a passing mention I found was this short listing. WP:MUSICBIO does not appear to provide a harbor for this article yet, either. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, postdlf (talk) 19:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination and Eggishorn. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:05, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.